HR, expert and successor · Planning meeting · 40 min

Knowledge transfer plan

Pass critical knowledge to a successor, on a plan, before the expert leaves.

1 / 16 · Mentor360

A big problem, weak preparation

  • Only 8% of organizations consistently capture leavers' knowledge
  • 16% don't try at all
  • Barriers: time, resources and senior leadership support

Source: APQC, 2025.

2 / 16 · Mentor360

What leaves with an expert?

When an expert leaves, the organization loses more than a person: intuition, relationships and knowledge of the exceptions go too.

Much of the Apollo program's knowledge was lost with retired engineers (DeLong, T+D 2005).

3 / 16 · Mentor360

Explicit and tacit knowledge

Explicit Tacit
What is it? Can be written down Embedded in experience
Example Procedure, specification Knowing a fault by its sound
Transfer Documents and training Shared experience, dialogue

The distinction comes from Nonaka's knowledge creation model.

4 / 16 · Mentor360

Step 1: Find the knowledge at risk

  1. Criticality: what's affected without this knowledge?
  2. Uniqueness: who else knows it?
  3. Tacitness: how much is written, how much in their head?
  4. Timing: when is the expert leaving?
5 / 16 · Mentor360

Priority: critical × unique

Low uniqueness High uniqueness
High criticality Document, back up Start here
Low criticality Monitor Handle in round two

TechnipFMC treats every departing expert as a separate project (APQC, 2025).

6 / 16 · Mentor360

Step 2: Choose the methods

  • Shadowing: the successor watches the expert at real work
  • Learning by doing: the successor does it, the expert gives feedback
  • Decision log: the expert briefly writes down assumptions
  • After-action review: plan compared with result
  • Relationship handover: joint meetings with key stakeholders

Experience-based expertise grows through guided experience (Leonard and Swap).

7 / 16 · Mentor360

Questions that unlock tacit knowledge

  • "What's the first thing you look at in this situation?"
  • "Can you tell me about a time the rule didn't hold?"
  • "What mistake do newcomers make most?"
  • "Whose view do you get on this decision?"

The successor reads the answers back in their own words; the expert corrects.

8 / 16 · Mentor360

Step 3: A one-page transfer plan

Knowledge area Method Readiness criterion
Budget negotiation Shadowing, decision log Runs one negotiation under supervision
Fault diagnosis Learning by doing Diagnoses 4 of the last 5 faults
Supplier relations Relationship handover Key introductions done
Quality procedures Documents, training Procedures up to date
9 / 16 · Mentor360

Timeline: 9–12 months

Period Focus
Months 0–1 Risk assessment, successor, plan approval
Months 2–4 Shadowing, decision log, documentation
Months 5–8 Learning by doing, expert steps back
Months 9–12 Successor independent, closing review

If time is short, focus on the 2–3 riskiest areas.

10 / 16 · Mentor360

Is the successor ready? Four levels

  1. Has watched, can describe the steps
  2. Can do it with the expert alongside
  3. Works independently, consults only on exceptions
  4. Can teach it and handle the unexpected

The plan is done when most critical areas reach Level 3.

11 / 16 · Mentor360

Who does what?

Role Responsibility
Expert Opens up knowledge, observes, gives feedback
Successor Asks, takes notes, applies
Manager Makes time, rates levels separately
HR Tracks the plan, makes contributions visible

Gaps between ratings show where more work is needed.

12 / 16 · Mentor360

No plan works without culture

  • Add knowledge transfer to the expert's job description
  • Make real time for it in their calendar
  • Make the expert's contribution visible and recognize it
  • Change the "knowledge is power" mindset in managers first

DeLong notes that competitive cultures weaken this effort.

13 / 16 · Mentor360

Exercise: Draft your first plan (15 min)

  1. List the expert's three critical knowledge areas
  2. Score each for criticality and uniqueness
  3. Choose a method for the riskiest area
  4. Set a target date and a readiness criterion

Have the expert, successor and manager compare results.

14 / 16 · Mentor360

Sources

  • APQC, 2025 — Great Retirement, knowledge capture rates
  • Salopek, T+D, 2005 — DeLong's warnings on risk and culture
  • Nonaka — tacit and explicit knowledge model
  • Leonard and Swap — Deep Smarts, experience-based expertise
  • After-action review — origins of the method
15 / 16 · Mentor360

Start the plan this week

Take the first step with one expert, one successor and a one-page plan.

mentor360.com.tr

16 / 16 · Mentor360